Fujifilm XP150 vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm XP150 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 205g - 103 x 71 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP150 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Fujifilm XP150 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP150 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm XP150 was brought out 12 months prior to the WB800F so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm XP150 grades versus the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP150 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP150 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP150 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP150 over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm XP150 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm XP150
| WB800F | Fujifilm XP150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP150 and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm XP150 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm XP150 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP150 enjoys external dimensions of 103mm x 71mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.8" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XP150 and Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XP150 versus the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP150 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XP150 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The graphic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP150 and WB800F.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB800F to render more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm XP150 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP150 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm XP150 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP150 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP150 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 9cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 71 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat), Couple, Portrait) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $260 | $300 |