Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP, both Waterproof cameras and both are offered by FujiFilm. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP200 was launched 3 years later than the Fujifilm Z33WP and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the Fujifilm Z33WP when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| Fujifilm XP200 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 46 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Fujifilm XP200
| Fujifilm Z33WP | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Fujifilm Z33WP
| Fujifilm XP200 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 enjoys outside measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Fujifilm Z33WP has specifications of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the Fujifilm Z33WP.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and Fujifilm Z33WP is 90 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through specs. The visual underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and Fujifilm Z33WP.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to provide more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XP200 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm XP200 vs Fujifilm Z33WP Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2009-07-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lb) | 110g (0.24 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | NP-45 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $250 | $197 |