Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530 Overview
Here is a extended review of the Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and M530 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 3 years later than the M530 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores vs the M530 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Kodak EasyShare M530. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Kodak M530 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Kodak M530
| Fujifilm XP200 | M530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 40 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Fujifilm XP200
| M530 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak M530
| Fujifilm XP200 | M530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 provides external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Kodak M530 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the M530.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and M530 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The photograph below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and M530.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Fujifilm XP200 to deliver greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XP200 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M530 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare M530 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare M530 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2010-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $250 | $110 |