Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M550
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M550 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M550 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus Kodak M550, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and M550 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XP200 was released 3 years after the M550 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up vs the M550 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M550 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Kodak EasyShare M550. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Kodak M550 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Kodak M550
| Fujifilm XP200 | M550 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 40 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Fujifilm XP200
| M550 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak M550
| Fujifilm XP200 | M550 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M550 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 has got external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Kodak M550 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XP200 versus Kodak M550 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the M550.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and M550 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M550 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and M550.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Fujifilm XP200 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M550 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak M550 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare M550 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare M550 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2010-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $250 | $119 |