Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8dbe/a8dbe87a76c6df650205e9886425d34d8f395a25" alt="Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aef05/aef054a76ac4c463fa63cf3d2f9990855fc6b928" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS front Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS front"
91 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the Z1485 IS (14MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and Z1485 IS (1/1.72") use different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm XP200 was launched 4 years after the Z1485 IS which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades vs the Z1485 IS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Kodak Z1485 IS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Kodak Z1485 IS
Fujifilm XP200 | Z1485 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 52 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Fujifilm XP200
Z1485 IS | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak Z1485 IS
Fujifilm XP200 | Z1485 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 has got exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Kodak Z1485 IS has proportions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the Z1485 IS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49126/49126e5d9bab4bd11bbce5f42a50a0b10f507189" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and Z1485 IS is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb258/eb258cc0989d93509479ca30fea80026ebbad625" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The picture below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and Z1485 IS.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Fujifilm XP200 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781e6/781e6555177ea9fee8681375a6d15c7a15fb60cc" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9516a/9516aed07dc65b823ac9e139ef44d2625b36d20b" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z1485 IS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.72" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.4 x 5.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4352 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $250 | $179 |