Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z950
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak Z950, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and Z950 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm XP200 was launched 2 years after the Z950 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades against the Z950 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm XP200 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 34 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm XP200
| Z950 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm XP200 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 enjoys external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak Z950 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the Z950.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and Z950 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching specs. The image here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and Z950.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Fujifilm XP200 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1/8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 243 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $250 | $250 |
