Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed September 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Lets look closer at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 19 months after the Easyshare M5370 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades vs the Easyshare M5370 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Kodak Easyshare M5370. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| Fujifilm XP200 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 | September 2011 | Newer by 19 months | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Fujifilm XP200
| Easyshare M5370 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
| Fujifilm XP200 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 features exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XP200 versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the Easyshare M5370.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and Easyshare M5370 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and Easyshare M5370.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of files although you should really consider the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent Fujifilm XP200 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm XP200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2011-09-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $250 | $160 |