Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A1000
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
86 Imaging
42 Features
64 Overall
50
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 330g - 114 x 72 x 41mm
- Released January 2019
- Superseded the Nikon A900
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A1000 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Fujifilm XP200 versus Nikon A1000, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the A1000 (16MP) is very well matched and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XP200 was announced 6 years prior to the A1000 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades vs the A1000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A1000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Nikon Coolpix A1000. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Nikon A1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Nikon A1000
| Fujifilm XP200 | A1000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon A1000 over the Fujifilm XP200
| A1000 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2019 |  | March 2013 | Fresher by 70 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon A1000
| Fujifilm XP200 | A1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A1000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 provides exterior dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Nikon A1000 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP200 versus Nikon A1000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the A1000.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and A1000 is 90 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A1000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and A1000.
All in all, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures but you would want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The older Fujifilm XP200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon A1000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix A1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix A1000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2019-01-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 6.00 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | No |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 114 x 72 x 41mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 250 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $250 | $477 |