Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
92 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Launched June 2012
- Superseded the Nikon P300
- Successor is Nikon P330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the P310 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XP200 was brought out 10 months after the P310 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up against the P310 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Nikon Coolpix P310. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Nikon P310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Nikon P310
| Fujifilm XP200 | P310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | June 2012 | Newer by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Nikon P310 over the Fujifilm XP200
| P310 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon P310
| Fujifilm XP200 | P310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 comes with physical measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Nikon P310 has dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the P310.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and P310 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at specs. The pic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and P310.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact MP so you can expect similar quality of pictures however you may want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon P310 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix P310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix P310 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2012-06-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 99 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-100mm (4.2x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 230 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $250 | $700 |
