Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
96 Imaging
45 Features
29 Overall
38
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 125g - 97 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2014
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the S3600 (20MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 9 months prior to the S3600 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the S3600 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Nikon Coolpix S3600. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Nikon S3600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Nikon S3600
| Fujifilm XP200 | S3600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S3600 over the Fujifilm XP200
| S3600 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | March 2013 | More recent by 9 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon S3600
| Fujifilm XP200 | S3600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 offers physical measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Nikon S3600 has specifications of 97mm x 58mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the S3600.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and S3600 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing technical specs. The visual below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and S3600.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S3600 to offer you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm XP200 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S3600 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix S3600 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix S3600 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 99 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.7-6.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280x720p (30fps) , 1280x720 (25p), 640x480 (30fps ) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 97 x 58 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 230 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $250 | $200 |