Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S6300
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
94 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S6300 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Nikon S6300, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Nikon. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the S6300 (16MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP200 was brought out 14 months after the S6300 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up vs the S6300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S6300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Nikon Coolpix S6300. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Nikon S6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Nikon S6300
| Fujifilm XP200 | S6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 14 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Fujifilm XP200
| S6300 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Nikon S6300
| Fujifilm XP200 | S6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S6300 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 has got external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Nikon S6300 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP200 versus Nikon S6300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the S6300.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and S6300 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S6300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The image underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and S6300.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you would want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The younger Fujifilm XP200 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm XP200 vs Nikon S6300 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Nikon Coolpix S6300 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2012-02-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 160 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 230 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $250 | $200 |