Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XP200 was announced 3 years later than the FE-4000 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the FE-4000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus FE-4000. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus FE-4000
| Fujifilm XP200 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 45 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Fujifilm XP200
| FE-4000 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus FE-4000
| Fujifilm XP200 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 provides external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4000 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the FE-4000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and FE-4000 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The visual below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and FE-4000.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to deliver greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XP200 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Also referred to as | - | X-925 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 136g (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $250 | $130 |