Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
 
               
              69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 3 years after the SP-800 UZ which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone        Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| Fujifilm XP200 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 39 months | 
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | 
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm XP200
| SP-800 UZ | Fujifilm XP200 | 
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| Fujifilm XP200 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen | 
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | 
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen | 
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP200 has external measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the SP-800 UZ.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and SP-800 UZ is 90 and 69 respectively.
 
          Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Fujifilm XP200 to offer more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP200 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
 
          Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
        
                
        Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus | 
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | 
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom | 
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2010-02-02 | 
| Physical type | Compact | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III | 
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP | 
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - | 
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 | 
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 | 
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 1000 | 
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 | 
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 | 
| Cross type focus points | - | - | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.6 | 
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm | 
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch | 
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None | 
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 12 seconds | 
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds | 
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.10 m | 
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 | 
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 | 
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 455 grams (1.00 lb) | 
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - | 
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - | 
| Battery ID | NP-50A | Li-50B | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | 
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal | 
| Card slots | One | One | 
| Launch cost | $250 | $270 | 



