Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8dbe/a8dbe87a76c6df650205e9886425d34d8f395a25" alt="Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/153be/153bee67a3de8b34d60d9df4ae954e556a9475c8" alt="Olympus SZ-30MR front Olympus SZ-30MR front"
89 Imaging
39 Features
39 Overall
39
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the SZ-30MR (16MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 2 years later than the SZ-30MR and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up against the SZ-30MR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus SZ-30MR. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus SZ-30MR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus SZ-30MR
Fujifilm XP200 | SZ-30MR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2013 | ![]() | March 2011 | Fresher by 26 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-30MR over the Fujifilm XP200
SZ-30MR | Fujifilm XP200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus SZ-30MR
Fujifilm XP200 | SZ-30MR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 has got physical dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-30MR has specifications of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the SZ-30MR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0bea/b0beaa9d7f54b4ac5efc7fd36afad58cec966abe" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and SZ-30MR is 90 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74117/741178533e8a3a5def1c3228a0789d9b83c0b28e" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The visual underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and SZ-30MR.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of pictures although you need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42a9f/42a9f26d7177e7c56c584ce67c2c0621c76f0087" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5ddd/b5ddd755aa9eefdd5f6e20bd334886a542f02387" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus SZ-30MR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus SZ-30MR |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2011-03-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 220 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50A | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $250 | $279 |