Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7000
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 172g - 96 x 56 x 25mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 7000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7000 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus 7000, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and 7000 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm XP200 was brought out 4 years after the 7000 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores against the 7000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus Stylus 7000. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus 7000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus 7000
| Fujifilm XP200 | 7000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 52 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7000 over the Fujifilm XP200
| 7000 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus 7000
| Fujifilm XP200 | 7000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 has got external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7000 has sizing of 96mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 172 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus 7000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the 7000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and 7000 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and 7000.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Fujifilm XP200 to give greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus 7000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus 7000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju 7000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2009-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 37-260mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) | 172 grams (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 96 x 56 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $250 | $280 |