Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju 7030
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the 7030 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm XP200 was unveiled 3 years after the 7030 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the 7030 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Olympus Stylus 7030. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Olympus 7030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus 7030
| Fujifilm XP200 | 7030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 39 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Fujifilm XP200
| 7030 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus 7030
| Fujifilm XP200 | 7030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 comes with physical dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7030 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the 7030.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and 7030 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and 7030.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Fujifilm XP200 to show more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 7030 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus 7030 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus 7030 |
| Alternative name | - | mju 7030 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9 and 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) | 140 gr (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $179 |