Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XP200 was announced 3 years after the 9000 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores vs the 9000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm XP200 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 47 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Fujifilm XP200
| 9000 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm XP200 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 provides external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the 9000.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and 9000 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The picture underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and 9000.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Fujifilm XP200 to provide greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also called | - | mju 9000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 225 gr (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $250 | $300 |