Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-2 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Announced March 2013
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Introduced March 2015
  • Older Model is Olympus SH-1
  • Updated by Olympus SH-3
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is fairly close and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 23 months before the SH-2 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the SH-2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

				

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus SH-2

 Fujifilm XP200 SH-2 
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Fujifilm XP200

 SH-2 Fujifilm XP200 
IntroducedMarch 2015March 2013Fresher by 23 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus SH-2

 Fujifilm XP200 SH-2 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 comes with outside dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

See the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the SH-2.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and SH-2 is 90 and 88 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and SH-2.

As you can tell, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you may want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm XP200 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography factors
Olympus SH-2 Portrait photography factors
30
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
44
resolution is good (16MP)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
manual focus not available
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm XP200
Street photography with Olympus SH-2
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
70
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
offers touch focus
lighter than competition (271g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography information
Olympus SH-2 Sports photography information
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
51
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
great battery life (380 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Travel photography advice
Olympus SH-2 Travel photography advice
66
environment sealing
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
74
great battery life (380 per charge)
lighter than competition (271g)
offers touch focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography information
Olympus SH-2 Landscape photography information
45
decently wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
54
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (380 CIPA)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging information
Olympus SH-2 Vlogging information
31
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
34
fairly wide (25mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (271 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
missing microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus SH-2
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Olympus Stylus SH-2
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Olympus Stylus SH-2
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-03-22 2015-03-11
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/3.0-6.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 11.5fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.10 m 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232 grams (0.51 pounds) 271 grams (0.60 pounds)
Dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures 380 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $250 $399