Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Revealed March 2013
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus Tough-3000, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm XP200 was manufactured 3 years after the Tough-3000 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the Tough-3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 Fujifilm XP200 Tough-3000 
RevealedMarch 2013January 2010More modern by 39 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Fujifilm XP200

 Tough-3000 Fujifilm XP200 

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus Tough-3000

 Fujifilm XP200 Tough-3000 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 comes with exterior dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the Tough-3000.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and Tough-3000 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and Tough-3000.

As you can see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Fujifilm XP200 to offer you greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm XP200
Portrait photography with Olympus Tough-3000
30
MP count good (16MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
21
no manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Street photography factors
Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography factors
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm XP200
Sports photography with Olympus Tough-3000
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
36
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
low frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm XP200
Travel photography with Olympus Tough-3000
66
environment proofing
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.9)
61
weather sealing
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography information
Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography information
45
relatively wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
35
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging information
Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging information
31
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not contain selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone jack
28
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus Tough-3000
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
Also called - mju Tough 3000
Type Waterproof Waterproof
Revealed 2013-03-22 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance - 2cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.10 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lbs) 159 gr (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-50A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $250 $0