Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 6020
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus 6020, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XP200 was unveiled 3 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades against the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm XP200 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 39 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Fujifilm XP200
| 6020 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm XP200 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 features exterior dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus 6020 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the 6020.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and 6020 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and 6020.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Fujifilm XP200 to show more detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP200 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Alternative name | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 122 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $279 |