Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8dbe/a8dbe87a76c6df650205e9886425d34d8f395a25" alt="Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-850 iHS, both Waterproof cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The Fujifilm XP200 was announced 10 months earlier than the TG-850 iHS so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores vs the TG-850 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
Fujifilm XP200 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Fujifilm XP200
TG-850 iHS | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | March 2013 | Newer by 10 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
Fujifilm XP200 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP200 enjoys exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-850 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8be7/f8be7432f421f70fa38373da4e5bea6aca2aa1b7" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-850 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23512/2351263843aee67bbb79b996afaf87a6cc9d758f" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-850 iHS.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of files but you may want to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/329e9/329e97c313a3d5cf63b21bdc25aac6c2b4714d0a" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e449/9e449235f24535ba3a9fb9e5de63dc453c6543bc" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 330 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50A | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $250 | $250 |