Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Announced March 2013
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Lets look closer at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310, both Waterproof cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The Fujifilm XP200 was launched 2 years later than the TG-310 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores against the TG-310 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 Fujifilm XP200 TG-310 
AnnouncedMarch 2013January 2011Fresher by 27 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Fujifilm XP200

          

          

            
 TG-310 Fujifilm XP200 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 Fujifilm XP200 TG-310 
Manual focus  Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither comes with Touch friendly display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 comes with external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the TG-310.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-310 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Often, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-310.
Clearly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

            Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm XP200
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-310
30
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 focusing manually not possible
 no manual mode
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
33
 good  resolution (14MP)
 supports face detect focus
 manual focus not available
 manual mode not possible
 external flash not possible
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Street photography details
Olympus TG-310 Street photography details
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather sealing
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather sealing
 lighter than others in class (155g)
 screen does not articulate
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography highlights
44
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 features tracking focus
 weather sealing
 max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect AF
40
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 supports tracking focus
 weather sealing
 max fps very slow (1.0 fps)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 not so great battery (150 shots)
 no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography factors
66
 weather sealing
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
67
 lighter than others in class (155 grams)
 weather sealing
 good  resolution (14MP)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (28mm)
 lack of Timelapse mode
 not so great battery (150 shots)
 display is not selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography info
45
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 weather sealing
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
 no manual mode
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
39
 fairly wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 weather sealing
 manual focus not available
 can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 small screen (2.7 inch)
 manual mode not possible
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW format
 not so great battery (150 per charge)
 lack of Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging advice
31
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 doesn't have mic port
32
 fairly wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detect focus
 lighter than others in class (155g)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 display is not selfie friendly
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
 lack of microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
        
                
        

          

            
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-310
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Olympus TG-310
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Olympus TG-310
Category Waterproof Waterproof
Announced 2013-03-22 2011-01-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 3.10 m 4.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lbs) 155 gr (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures 150 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting    
Storage media SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $250 $0