Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XP200 was announced 11 months later than the TG-1 iHS so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up vs the TG-1 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm XP200 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 |  | May 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 610k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Fujifilm XP200
| TG-1 iHS | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm XP200 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 features exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has sizing of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-1 iHS is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-1 iHS.
As you can see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Fujifilm XP200 to give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 350 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $250 | $399 |