Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-3, both Waterproof cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm XP200 was released 12 months before the TG-3 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores vs the TG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus TG-3
| Fujifilm XP200 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Fujifilm XP200
| TG-3 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | March 2013 | More recent by 12 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-3
| Fujifilm XP200 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 has got outer dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the TG-3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-3 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-3.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should always factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography highlights
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Street photography factors
Olympus TG-3 Street photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than others in class (247g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
great battery life (330 per charge)
slow fps (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Travel photography camera
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
great battery life (330 per charge)
environment sealing
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than others in class (247 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Landscape photography camera
really wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
environment proof
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
great battery life (330 per charge)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-3 Vlogging factors
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic port
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic support
heavier than others in class (247 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $250 | $350 |
