Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3

Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-3 front
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Announced March 2013
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Announced March 2014
  • Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview

In this article, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-3, both Waterproof cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm XP200 was released 12 months before the TG-3 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores vs the TG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus TG-3

		

		

			
 Fujifilm XP200 TG-3 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Fujifilm XP200

		

		

			
 TG-3 Fujifilm XP200 
AnnouncedMarch 2014March 2013More recent by 12 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-3

		

		

			
 Fujifilm XP200 TG-3 
Focus manually  No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen  Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither contains Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 has got outer dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the TG-3.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-3 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-3.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should always factor the launch date  of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
	
			Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography highlights
30
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 no manual focus
 no manual mode
 cannot use external flash
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
37
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 provides face detection focusing
 lack of manual focus
 can't use external flash
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Street Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Street photography factors
Olympus TG-3 Street photography factors
61
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proof
 no moving screen
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
59
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment sealing
 no articulating screen
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 heavier than others in class (247g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography features
45
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking focus
 environment proof
 max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
 no shutter priority mode
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no phase detect auto focus
47
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 provides tracking autofocus
 environment sealing
 great battery life (330 per charge)
 slow fps (5.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
 Fujifilm XP200 as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus TG-3 as a Travel photography camera
66
 environment proof
 decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 really wide (28mm)
 lack of Time Lapse function
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
74
 great battery life (330 per charge)
 environment sealing
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 really wide (25mm)
 great maximum aperture (f2.0)
 heavier than others in class (247 grams)
 does not posses selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
 Fujifilm XP200 as a Landscape photography camera
 Olympus TG-3 as a Landscape photography camera
45
 really wide (28mm)
 nice screen size (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent sensor resolution (16MP)
 environment proof
 no manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 no manual mode
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 lack of Time Lapse function
56
 really wide (25mm)
 great maximum aperture (f2.0)
 nice screen size (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 environment sealing
 great battery life (330 per charge)
 lack of manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-3 Vlogging factors
32
 really wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of mic port
34
 really wide (25mm)
 great maximum aperture (f2.0)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detection focusing
 video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 does not posses selfie friendly screen
 doesn't have external mic support
 heavier than others in class (247 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	

		

			
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-3
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Olympus Tough TG-3
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Olympus Tough TG-3
Type Waterproof Waterproof
Announced 2013-03-22 2014-03-31
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 3:2
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT-LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 3.10 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
External flash    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 232 grams (0.51 lbs) 247 grams (0.54 lbs)
Dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs 330 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $250 $350