Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-4, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 3 years earlier than the TG-4 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the TG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus TG-4
| Fujifilm XP200 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Fujifilm XP200
| TG-4 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | March 2013 | More modern by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-4
| Fujifilm XP200 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 comes with outer measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the TG-4.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-4 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and TG-4.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you should take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography advice
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
supports RAW formats
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Fujifilm XP200
Street photography with Olympus TG-4
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (247g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography info
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography info
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
weather proof
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
weather proofing
great battery pack (380 shots)
slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography highlights
weather proof
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
great battery pack (380 shots)
weather proofing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition (247g)
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
great battery pack (380 per charge)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging factors
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not have selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic port
heavier than competition (247g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 380 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $250 | $379 |