Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VH-515
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus VH-515, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XP200 was brought out 8 months later than the VH-515 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores vs the VH-515 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Olympus VH-515. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus VH-515
| Fujifilm XP200 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2013 |  | August 2012 | More recent by 8 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Fujifilm XP200
| VH-515 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus VH-515
| Fujifilm XP200 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 has physical dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus VH-515 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the VH-515.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and VH-515 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and VH-515.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm XP200 to offer you extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus VH-515 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 152 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $250 | $648 |