Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VR-320
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus VR-320, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XP200 was unveiled 21 months after the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up against the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm XP200 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 21 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm XP200
| VR-320 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm XP200 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 offers outer measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the VR-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and VR-320.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Fujifilm XP200 to resolve greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $179 |