Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 2 years later than the XZ-1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades vs the XZ-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus XZ-1
Fujifilm XP200 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 27 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Fujifilm XP200
XZ-1 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus XZ-1
Fujifilm XP200 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 provides exterior dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the XZ-1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and XZ-1 is 90 and 88 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and XZ-1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XP200 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Fujifilm XP200 will show more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP200 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 275 gr (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 320 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50A | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $250 | $567 |