Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Launched March 2013
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 2 years later than the XZ-1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades vs the XZ-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus XZ-1

 Fujifilm XP200 XZ-1 
IntroducedMarch 2013January 2011Fresher by 27 months
Screen resolution920k614kClearer screen (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Fujifilm XP200

 XZ-1 Fujifilm XP200 
Manual focus More accurate focus

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus XZ-1

 Fujifilm XP200 XZ-1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 provides exterior dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the XZ-1.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and XZ-1 is 90 and 88 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and XZ-1.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XP200 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Fujifilm XP200 will show more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP200 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm XP200
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-1
30
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
45
has manual focus
features face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Street photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography info
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
more heavy than competitors in class (275 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm XP200
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-1
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
better than average battery power (320 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Travel photography factors
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography factors
66
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
62
better than average battery power (320 CIPA)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography highlights
45
rather wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
54
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (320 shots)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
lack of Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging details
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging details
31
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic port
31
decently wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (275g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus XZ-1
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Olympus XZ-1
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2013-03-22 2011-01-26
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.63"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3664 x 2752
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 11
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.10 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lb) 275 gr (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 34
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 117
Other
Battery life 300 photos 320 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $250 $567