Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh CX3, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The Fujifilm XP200 was released 2 years later than the CX3 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up against the CX3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Ricoh CX3. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh CX3
Fujifilm XP200 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2013 | ![]() | June 2010 | More recent by 34 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Fujifilm XP200
CX3 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh CX3
Fujifilm XP200 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 offers exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh CX3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the CX3.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and CX3 is 90 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The visual below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and CX3.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP200 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh CX3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh CX3 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $250 | $329 |