Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
40
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Ricoh CX3 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Launched March 2013
Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced June 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview

Here, we are matching up the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh CX3, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Fujifilm XP200 was released 2 years later than the CX3 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up against the CX3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh CX3

 Fujifilm XP200 CX3 
IntroducedMarch 2013June 2010More recent by 34 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Fujifilm XP200

 CX3 Fujifilm XP200 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh CX3

 Fujifilm XP200 CX3 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Display resolution920k920kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 offers exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

See the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh CX3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the CX3.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and CX3 is 90 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The visual below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and CX3.

To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP200 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm XP200
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX3
30
resolution is good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
27
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Street photography features
Ricoh CX3 Street photography features
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography features
Ricoh CX3 Sports photography features
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX3 Travel photography factors
66
weather sealing
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
does not have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
66
lighter than competition (206g)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography info
Ricoh CX3 Landscape photography info
45
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
weather sealing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
42
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh CX3 Vlogging highlights
32
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic port
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh CX3
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Ricoh CX3
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Ricoh
Model type Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Ricoh CX3
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-03-22 2010-06-16
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Max aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.10 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232 grams (0.51 pounds) 206 grams (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-50A DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $250 $329