Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX4
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh CX4, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 2 years after the CX4 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades against the CX4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm XP200 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm XP200
| CX4 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm XP200 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 has got outer dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the CX4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and CX4 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and CX4.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Fujifilm XP200 to render extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP200 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $250 | $211 |