Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm XP200 was announced 5 years before the G900 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades against the G900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh G900
| Fujifilm XP200 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Fujifilm XP200
| G900 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | March 2013 | Newer by 59 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh G900
| Fujifilm XP200 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 has got external measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the G900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and G900 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The pic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and G900.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh G900 to give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh G900 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 340 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $250 | $752 |