Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8dbe/a8dbe87a76c6df650205e9886425d34d8f395a25" alt="Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The Fujifilm XP200 was announced 3 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades versus the GR Digital III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm XP200 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 45 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Fujifilm XP200
GR Digital III | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm XP200 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP200 provides physical measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f46ec/f46ecf0edddeca62cfcf8ff6d16375ecd3fa65ef" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and GR Digital III is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c16f/6c16f5022b0767eb4912137bfc34e331d9b95d26" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and GR Digital III.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XP200 using its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Fujifilm XP200 will render extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP200 will have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18ba3/18ba38971f505531c66dcc61e61daef5fcb6ae25" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c00d/9c00dd4496adc271363c7d7a830e9b5a3d9ae43e" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 lbs) | 208g (0.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $250 | $399 |