Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizing.

The Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 19 months after the GR Digital IV making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores vs the GR Digital IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm XP200 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm XP200
GR Digital IV | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm XP200 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 has physical measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the GR Digital IV.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and GR Digital IV is 90 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and GR Digital IV.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm XP200 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Fujifilm XP200 will give you more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP200 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-03-22 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 390 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50A | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $250 | $599 |