Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX Overview
The following is a in depth overview of the Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the PX (16MP) is relatively similar and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP200 was released 20 months after the PX which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades against the PX in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Ricoh PX. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh PX
| Fujifilm XP200 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | August 2011 | Newer by 20 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Fujifilm XP200
| PX | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh PX
| Fujifilm XP200 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 has got outer dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the PX.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and PX is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The pic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and PX.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs though you may want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The newer Fujifilm XP200 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh PX |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 156 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $250 | $329 |