Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30W
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-30W, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XP200 was launched 18 months before the WG-30W which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores against the WG-30W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Ricoh WG-30W. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Fujifilm XP200
| WG-30W | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 |  | March 2013 | Newer by 18 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-30W
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 comes with exterior dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-30W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the WG-30W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-30W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The picture here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-30W.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels and you can expect similar quality of photos though you should always factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $250 | $280 |