Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Introduced March 2013
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof cameras by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 10 months before the WG-4 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-4

 Fujifilm XP200 WG-4 
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Fujifilm XP200

 WG-4 Fujifilm XP200 
LaunchedFebruary 2014March 2013Newer by 10 months
Manual focus Very exact focus

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-4

 Fujifilm XP200 WG-4 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 has got external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the WG-4.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-4 is 90 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The picture below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-4.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of images but you really should consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm XP200
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4
30
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
41
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
has face detection focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography factors
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm XP200
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
weather proof
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
low battery power (240 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm XP200
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4
66
weather proof
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
72
environment sealing
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery power (240 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography features
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography features
45
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse function
54
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
low battery power (240 per charge)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging features
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging features
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no mic port
36
quite wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-4
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Company FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Ricoh WG-4
Category Waterproof Waterproof
Introduced 2013-03-22 2014-02-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.10 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232 grams (0.51 lbs) 230 grams (0.51 lbs)
Physical dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images 240 images
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50A D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $250 $330