Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 23 months earlier than the WG-5 GPS making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the WG-5 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Fujifilm XP200 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Fujifilm XP200
WG-5 GPS | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | March 2013 | Fresher by 23 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Fujifilm XP200 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 provides exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the WG-5 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-5 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos but you will need to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm XP200 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 lb) | 236g (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 240 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50A | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $250 | $500 |