Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
39
Overall
40

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Announced March 2013
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released May 2017
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up against the WG-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-50

 Fujifilm XP200 WG-50 
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Fujifilm XP200

 WG-50 Fujifilm XP200 
ReleasedMay 2017March 2013Fresher by 50 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-50

 Fujifilm XP200 WG-50 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP200 has external measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Contrast the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the WG-50.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-50 is 90 and 91 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-50.

Clearly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photos although you should consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-50 Portrait photography information
30
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
41
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm XP200
Street photography with Ricoh WG-50
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography features
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has tracking focus
environment proof
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
49
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
environment proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Travel photography advice
Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography advice
66
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
71
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Landscape photography camera
45
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
48
manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging info
Ricoh WG-50 Vlogging info
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone socket
33
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
has face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic support
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-50
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Ricoh WG-50
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Ricoh WG-50
Type Waterproof Waterproof
Announced 2013-03-22 2017-05-24
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.10 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync On, off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lb) 193 gr (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 shots 300 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50A D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots One One
Launch cost $250 $280