Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up against the WG-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-50
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Fujifilm XP200
| WG-50 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 | March 2013 | Fresher by 50 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-50
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP200 has external measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the WG-50.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-50 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-50.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photos although you should consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 300 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $250 | $280 |