Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-80
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-80, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XP200 was unveiled 10 years earlier than the WG-80 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the WG-80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Fujifilm XP200
| WG-80 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 | March 2013 | Newer by 111 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm XP200 has got exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-80 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the WG-80.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-80 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The pic underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-80.
To sum up, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photos although you might want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $250 | $300 |