Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-M1
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 17 months prior to the WG-M1 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm XP200
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | March 2013 | More recent by 17 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 enjoys physical dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-M1 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-M1.
Clearly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to offer more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm XP200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $250 | $2,000 |