Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8dbe/a8dbe87a76c6df650205e9886425d34d8f395a25" alt="Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da11d/da11d6967e1ef4aa2862495fa7f379f18dc98f62" alt="Samsung HZ30W front Samsung HZ30W front"
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is WB600
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung HZ30W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The Fujifilm XP200 was released 3 years later than the HZ30W and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades vs the HZ30W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Samsung HZ30W. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung HZ30W
Fujifilm XP200 | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 39 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Fujifilm XP200
HZ30W | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung HZ30W
Fujifilm XP200 | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP200 offers outside dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung HZ30W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung HZ30W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the HZ30W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/464b9/464b999b24974bb62266b2d7bcadf15777ce4e33" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and HZ30W is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bb26/0bb2672ab591a65d03876738c0b67ff2e6056a1f" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The photograph below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XP200 and HZ30W.
To sum up, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Fujifilm XP200 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP200 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5536/a5536a3774cbace2c793cb324f2c3d65f45d7b68" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f47bf/f47bf228299bbd5c88acd49a41c01d508249e135" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung HZ30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung HZ30W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB600 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2010-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $250 | $280 |