Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung TL500
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Also Known as EX1
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung TL500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 2 years later than the TL500 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the TL500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Samsung TL500. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung TL500
| Fujifilm XP200 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 33 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 614k | Crisper screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Fujifilm XP200
| TL500 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung TL500
| Fujifilm XP200 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 enjoys external measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung TL500 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the TL500.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and TL500 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and TL500.
As you can see, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm XP200 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Fujifilm XP200 will resolve more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung TL500 |
| Also called | - | EX1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2010-07-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 386 gr (0.85 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $527 |