Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB150F
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung WB150F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XP200 was launched 15 months after the WB150F which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores against the WB150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Samsung WB150F. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung WB150F
| Fujifilm XP200 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 15 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Fujifilm XP200
| WB150F | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB150F
| Fujifilm XP200 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 provides outer dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB150F has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung WB150F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the WB150F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and WB150F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and WB150F.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Fujifilm XP200 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP200 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB150F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lbs) | 188g (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $250 | $230 |