Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB350F
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB350F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XP200 was released 9 months before the WB350F which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores against the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm XP200 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm XP200
| WB350F | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | March 2013 | Newer by 9 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm XP200 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 has got outer measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the WB350F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and WB350F is 90 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The pic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and WB350F.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files though you really should take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 276 grams (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $250 | $260 |
