Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Announced March 2013
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung WB35F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm XP200 was brought out 9 months prior to the WB35F so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores vs the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

				

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung WB35F

 Fujifilm XP200 WB35F 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm XP200

 WB35F Fujifilm XP200 
RevealedJanuary 2014March 2013More recent by 9 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB35F

 Fujifilm XP200 WB35F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 offers physical measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the WB35F.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and WB35F is 90 and 93 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and WB35F.

As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels so you should expect similar quality of photos however you should take the production date of the products into consideration. The older Fujifilm XP200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography factors
30
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
37
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Street photography camera
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (194 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography info
Samsung WB35F Sports photography info
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm XP200
Travel photography with Samsung WB35F
66
weather proof
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
70
lighter than competitors (194g)
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm XP200
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
45
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
43
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB35F Vlogging highlights
31
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic port
31
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (194g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone port
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB35F
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Samsung WB35F
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Samsung WB35F
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-03-22 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/3.1-6.3
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.10 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lbs) 194 gr (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-50A BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/ SDHC/ SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $250 $130