Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB50F
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB50F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP200 was launched 9 months prior to the WB50F so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades against the WB50F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Samsung WB50F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm XP200 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Fujifilm XP200
| WB50F | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | March 2013 | Newer by 9 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm XP200 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 offers outside measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB50F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 against the WB50F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and WB50F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The image underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and WB50F.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution so you should expect similar quality of photos though you would want to take the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lb) | 207g (0.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $250 | $180 |