Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB800F
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm XP200 was launched 3 months later than the WB800F so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm XP200 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm XP200
| WB800F | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm XP200 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 | January 2013 | Same generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 offers outside dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP200 versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the WB800F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and WB800F.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you should factor the production date of the cameras into account.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $250 | $300 |