Fujifilm XP200 vs Sony S950
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm XP200 vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Sony S950 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Sony S950, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and S950 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm XP200 was manufactured 4 years after the S950 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores against the S950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP200 vs Sony S950 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Sony S950
| Fujifilm XP200 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 | February 2009 | More modern by 50 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Fujifilm XP200
| S950 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Sony S950
| Fujifilm XP200 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 features outer measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony S950 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Sony S950 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 compared to the S950.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and S950 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at specifications. The pic below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and S950.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm XP200 to give more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP200 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP200 vs Sony S950 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-03-22 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $250 | $130 |