Fujifilm XP50 vs Kodak Z950
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
93 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Portability
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm XP50 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
Fujifilm XP50
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 175g - 99 x 68 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2012
- Old Model is Fujifilm XP30
- Renewed by Fujifilm XP60
Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm XP50 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Fujifilm XP50 versus Kodak Z950, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP50 (14MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XP50 was launched 19 months after the Z950 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm XP50 grades versus the Z950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP50 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP50 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP50 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP50 over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm XP50 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm XP50
| Z950 | Fujifilm XP50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP50 and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm XP50 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP50 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP50 has got outer measurements of 99mm x 68mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has sizing of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP50 versus Kodak Z950 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm XP50 versus the Z950.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP50 and Z950 is 93 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm XP50 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP50 and Z950.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Fujifilm XP50 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP50 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP50 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm XP50 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Portrait photography camera
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
has manual focus
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Street photography with Fujifilm XP50
Street photography with Kodak Z950
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than competition (243g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm XP50
Sports photography with Kodak Z950
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (220 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250s)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Fujifilm XP50 Travel photography highlights
Kodak Z950 Travel photography highlights
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
has built in flash
very long zoom (350mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (243g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm XP50 Landscape photography info
Kodak Z950 Landscape photography info
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
bad battery pack (220 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
has manual focus
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm XP50 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak Z950 as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic socket
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competition (243 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm XP50 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP50 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP50 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 pounds) | 243g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 68 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat), Couple, Portrait) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $180 | $250 |