Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Z950
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Released June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Fujifilm Z33WP and Kodak Z950, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is very well matched and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm Z33WP was manufactured 11 months prior to the Z950 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades versus the Z950 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm Z33WP | Z950 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| Z950 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2010 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm Z33WP | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z33WP has got external dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Z33WP and Kodak Z950 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP vs the Z950.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z33WP and Z950 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Z950.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Kodak Z950 to give extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 110 grams (0.24 lb) | 243 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $197 | $250 |